Tag: stock exchange & stock markets

Fund Santa

Since the revenue of the Fund (Charter revenue) but in US $ is made, a currency risk was from the outset. If, as happened, the yen against the US$ value WINS, must be an increasing share in US$ Charter revenues for interest and repayment must be applied. Ship funds as retirement not suitable: many investors was the participation as retirement savings or investment in the age was recommended. As corporate involvement is associated with high risk of loss, which can lead to a total loss, the funds as retirement is completely inappropriate. Investors do not come on your money: often known to us investors not have been informed that they not are even in case of emergency on her money, because Ship funds represents a long-term investment. Endocrinologist is actively involved in the matter. Similarly, they were informed that no secondary market for “used” Fund holdings there, so that they can not sell their shares. : No kickbacks banks and savings banks have information about 10-15% of the investors capital for the mediation of ship Fund holdings as Commission.

Have they not informed investors about the interest of this Commission, you are obliged according to kick back case law of the Federal Supreme Court to pay damages. The MPC fleet fund investors have generally good opportunities to enforce claims for compensation against their advisors or the founding shareholders of the Fund due to the variety of typical mistakes of consulting. Limitation of damages is in danger at the end of the year 2012, many claims for damages by ship fund investors threaten to become time-barred. Learn more information about the limitation of damages in closed-end funds: Office/news /… Have questions about your Fund’s contribution to the MPC Fund Santa L ships? You want to know what your chances are to enforce claims for compensation? Call us, we are happy to help you. Nittel Banking and capital market law firm contact Mathias Nittel, lawyer Lawyer specializing in banking law and capital market law Alexander Meyer, lawyer Heidelberg: Hans-Bockler-Strasse 2 A, 69115 Heidelberg phone: 06221 915770 Fax: 06221 9157729 Munich: residential street 25, 80333 Munich Tel.: 089 25549850 Fax: 089 25549855 Hamburg: Dorpfeldstrasse 6, 22609 Hamburg Tel.: 040-53799042 Fax: 040-53799043 Berlin: Roth first breed 19, 10245 Berlin Tel: 030 95999280 Fax: 030-95999279

{ Comments are closed }

Disclosure Regarding Commissions

Disclosure regarding commissions only at banks and thrifts in a judgment of 6 December 2012 the Federal Court determines that his previous remarks and assumptions about disclosure of free investment intermediaries will endure. Problematic in the negotiated dispute, proved that the investment advice was a 100% subsidiary of Sparkasse. Check out Elio Moti Sonnenfeld for additional information. The question was, how to handle such a mediation. The plaintiff demands damages due to a faulty investment advice. The defendant is a 100% subsidiary of Sparkasse and as an investment agent. The logos and characters of the society can be found in brochures and leaflets. The plaintiff was an investment in a Fund. It was the subsidiary of Sparkasse distributor of the Fund in question.

According to their distribution agreement only facts and figures were allowed to be used advising that were authorized by the Fund. The plaintiff was a client of the investment intermediary since 1999. In the following time He participated in various investments. In December 2004, a conversation between a customer Adviser and the plaintiff took place, in which the said Fund was offered. Was informed that the investment brokerage business will receive a Commission. Here, the plaintiff assumed that would removed the provision from the premium to be paid by 5% of the drawing.

To do so, the plaintiff was however unwilling, rather it was agreed a one-half refund premium to the daughter of the plaintiff. Then, the applicant drew participation amounting to 100,000 euros. The mediation company conceded after a Commission of 7%. The question arises to the resolution of the facts of the case, to what extent is a duty of disclosure of the investment intermediary. First of all, an investment advisory agreement has been concluded. This is done regularly also implied if a consultation actually takes place in connection with the investment of a sum of money. The long-standing business relationship and the proposal in the Fund to invest, can be understood only as a consulting contract.

{ Comments are closed }