In the Buddhism, the question still follows the same parameter. The Buddhists understand that the life is a gift of Buddha. The scientific vision does not present that the life has its beginning at a specific moment. But they adopt the Report of Warnock, understanding the formation of the central nervous system as an important aspect for human development (CAMERON; WILLIAMSON, 2005, P. 216). Some authors of the modern philosophy consider that Human being he is that capable one to develop mental abilities that make possible its definition as human. Health Care CEOs: the source for more info. It is the individual reflecting on the individual.
Incapable beings of reflection can not be considered human. (CAMERON; WILLIAMSON, 2005, P. 216) Consideraes Final We assume that the human embryo, since the fecundao, is a human being that has rights and has a moral necessity to respect it. Biology does not teach ethical concepts as the respect and the duty. In against departure, the ethics do not teach biological principles of the human being. Therefore, the union of biology and the ethics is basic for the arrival to a common sense. In this article some points of view in relation to the embryo had been displayed, always considering the vision of the ethics and the religion, that in determined moments, in them takes the least the partial vision of the embryo. But, as the objective of this article is to show the embryo as a human being endowed with possibilities, we consider the reached objective. By means of some arguments, it had the possibility to show the embryo not only as one accumulated of cells, but, yes, a future human being. References LOPEZ, S.G.B. Bio. 5 ed. So Paulo: Hail, 1996. PESSINI, L; BARCHIFONTAINE, C.P. current Problems of the biotica. 5 ed. So Paulo: Loyola editions, 2002. MOREIRA. the Manual S. of the biotica. 2 ed. So Paulo. Loyola editions, 2002. BOCUGET, V. The being in gestation. Loyola editions. So Paulo, 2002. CAMERON, C.; WILLIAMSON, R. In the world of Dolly, when you donate human embryo acquire respect? Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 31 2005. p.215-220. Revised writing: Prof. Andres Mika.